Please wait

British troops risk their lives to protect the UK and our way of life

but what about the people who should be watching their backs?

Unfortunately, it seems very few are actually doing their jobs...

The Views of Stephen McPartland MP
MP for Stevenage, Hertfordshire

His views on the official explanation for the events of 9/11

Refused to say - Despite repeated enquiries Stephen McPartland MP refused to give any opinion on the validity of the official explanation for the events of 9/11. He may believe the official story or he may have his doubts, either way he simply refused to say.

Summary

Stephen McPartland MP was asked by Stevenage constituent, Mr Mallett, to state his opinion on the validity of the official explanation for the events of 9/11. Despite the question being repeatedly asked over a period of 12 months Steven McPartland used a number of methods to avoid providing any sort of relevant answer. Even when informed of clear evidence which proves the official explanation to be scientifically impossible Steven McPartland preferred to remain squarely on the fence and even refused Mr Mallett's requests for an appointment to discuss the matter further, and maybe get a straight answer, at one of his surgeries.

Steven McPartland finished by falling back on an excuse that "I simply do not agree that as a British Member of Parliament representing Stevenage that I can interfere in the internal judicial processes of the USA."

Steven McPartland was never asked to interfere in any way with the United States judicial system. British troops are not controlled, financed or staffed by the United States but they were sent to Afghanistan by the British Government as a direct result of a British analysis of the attack on the United States on 9/11. Overwhelming evidence now shows that analysis to be badly flawed and that is what Steven McPartland was asked for his views on.

Judging from the brief communications Stephen McPartland did send he seems to have no interest in the safety of British troops serving in Afghanistan including those members of his own constituency currently serving in Afghanistan and whom he represents in the UK Parliament.

When the truth about 9/11 does emerge Stephen McPartland MP will have no possibility of the old "I didn't know about it" excuse.

Information relevant to an ability to understand the evidence

Stephen McPartland MP is a member of the House of Commons Science and Technology Select Committee. Hopefully this would indicate that Stephen McPartland has at least some understanding of the basic laws of physics as taught to school children. It has been clearly explained to Stephen McPartland that the official explanation for 9/11 breaks several of those same laws of physics but with he has made no response.

Other information of note

Prior to being elected an MP, Stephen McPartland was the Director of Membership for British American Business (the US Chamber of Commerce), based in London.
Source - Stephen McPartland's own website biography


Contact log

Only Stephen McPartland and Mr Mallett's names have been included below. Since it is not known if Stephen McPartland's assistants share his views their names have been obscured to be fair to them.

Index of correspondence

Date

Title

23/06/2011

Message sent via Stephen McPartland MP's website contact form

29/07/2011

Reply from Stephen McPartland MP via email

29/07/2011

Email reply sent to Stephen McPartland MP

15/08/2011

Email recieved from Stephen McPartland MP's Parliamentary Caseworker

15/08/2011

Email reply to Stephen McPartland MP's Parliamentary Caseworker

24/08/2011

Email reply from Stephen McPartland MP

25/08/2011

Email sent to Stephen McPartland MP

05/09/2011

Further email sent to Stephen McPartland MP

20/07/2012

New enquiry to Stephen McPartland MP via email

24/07/2012

Email reply from Stephen McPartland MP's case worker

25/07/2012

Email to Stephen McPartland MP's case worker

25/07/2012

Reply from Stephen McPartland MP himself

26/07/2012

Reply to Stephen McPartland

31/07/2012

Follow up email to Stephen McPartland MP

06/08/2012

Further follow up email to Stephen McPartland MP

07/08/2012

Email reply from Stephen McPartland MP

07/08/2012

Final email to Stephen McPartland MP


26/07/2012 - Reply to Stephen McPartland

Hello Stephen. Thank you for taking the time to reply.

I am not asking you to interfere in anything to do with the US nor will I ever do so. The original reason given for the BRITISH involvement in Afghanistan was to 'hunt down Osama Bin Laden and al-qaeda to protect the UK from terrorist attack' but that was as a direct result of the 9/11 attack on the US. Since then over 400 BRITISH troops have been killed in Afghanistan, thousands more BRITISH troops have been injured both physically and psychologically and the BRITISH government has spent over 18 Billion of BRITISH tax payers money on the war. I commend you for your stance on opposing the war initially but you ARE part of the current government and BRITISH troops are still there. That makes this very relevant to a British Member of Parliament whether you like it or not. There are a few MPs who have publically expressed concerns regarding the 9/11 cover up but due to parliamentary protocol I can only expect a reply if I contact you as you are my MP.

For your information there have been four guys killed from Herts in Afghanistan to date...

Ryan Tomlin, RAF Regiment from Hemel Hempstead, Hertfordshire killed 13/02/2012
Thomas Lake, Princess of Wales Royal Regiment from Watford, Hertfordshire killed 20/11/2011
David Boyce, Dragoon Guards from Welwyn Garden City, Hertfordshire killed 17/11/2011
David Barnsdale, 33 Engineer Regiment from Tring, Hertfordshire killed 20/10/2010

I know they were not from Stevenage which means they were not your constituents but they were not from the US, they were from Hertfordshire, right on your door step.

"Good luck with your campaign, but I will not be able to assist you in this matter." can be translated as "Good luck with your campaign to get Parliament and the UK media to start asking some difficult questions about an event which has had a huge effect on the UK, but I will not be able to assist you in this matter as I prefer to carry on being part of a government which would rather allow our troops to be killed than even question the credibility of the reason they are being asked to risk their lives in the first place."

I am not asking you to join our campaign as you are the target for our campaign. Our campaign is directed at the Government and main stream Media to try to get them to start asking the difficult questions and stop covering up the truth. Part of that campaign is to get the BBC to stop making programs like the '9/11 road trip' which was just blatant propaganda. That part has now reached the BBC trust level. The campaign aimed at the government is because YOU are the group of people who are responsible for sending our troops into harms way and that should only ever be done on a legal, legitimate basis. If you didn't agree with the war in Afghanistan then I assume you don't want the troops there now. If that's the case then showing your fellow members of parliament that the original reason for deploying troops was completely false is a great way to help bring them home.

I also note that you have avoided answering my question yet again. Do you believe the official story for the events of 9/11 or not?

I would still like to meet with you at your surgery on September 14th or sooner should you feel that it is important for a British Member of Parliament representing Stevenage to have an interest in the well being of British troops.

Thanks for your time,

Mr Mallett.


« Previous item

^ Return to index ^

Next item »