Please wait

British troops risk their lives to protect the UK and our way of life

but what about the people who should be watching their backs?

Unfortunately, it seems very few are actually doing their jobs...

Full details of the BBC complaint from Paul Warburton

Index of complaint correspondence

Date

Title

13/04/2011

Letter to trustees on the BBC Editorial Standards Committee

04/05/2011

Letter to trustees on the BBC Editorial Standards Committee

10/05/2011

Letter to BBC Complaints

08/06/2011

Letter to trustees on the BBC Editorial Standards Committee

17/06/2011

Letter to trustees on the BBC Editorial Standards Committee

01/07/2011

Letter to the BBC Trustees

07/07/2011

Letter to trustees on the BBC Editorial Standards Committee

16/07/2011

Letter to trustees on the BBC Editorial Standards Committee

13/08/2011

Letter to trustees on the BBC Editorial Standards Committee

30/08/2011

Letter to trustees on the BBC Editorial Standards Committee

12/09/2011

Letter to trustees on the BBC Editorial Standards Committee

07/11/2011

Letter to trustees on the BBC Editorial Standards Committee

13/12/2011

Letter to trustees on the BBC Editorial Standards Committee

03/01/2012

Letter to the BBC Trust

04/02/2012

Letter to the BBC Trust

08/02/2012

Letter to trustees on the BBC Editorial Standards Committee

16/02/2012

Letter to the BBC Editorial Complaints Unit

02/04/2012

Letter to the BBC Trust

16/06/2012

Letter to the BBC Editorial Standards Committee

13/06/2012

Reply from BBC - Conspiracy Files Warburton (PDF)

13/06/2012

Reply from BBC - Conspiracy Files Annex 2 (PDF)


08/02/2012 - Letter to trustees on the BBC Editorial Standards Committee

BBC Trustees
Editorial Standards Committee
Alison Hastings (Chair), Richard Ayre,
Anthony Fry, David Liddiment,
Mehmuda Mian, Elan Closs Stephens
180 Great Portland Street
London
W1W 5QZ

8th February 2012

Dear

The BBC's coverage of the 9/11 Attacks

Laws can embody standards; Govts can enforce laws - but the final task is not a task for Govt. It is a task for each and every one of us. Every time we turn our heads the other way when we see the law flouted - when we tolerate what we know to be wrong - when we close our eyes and ears to the corrupt because we are too busy, or too frightened - when we fail to speak up and speak out - we strike a blow against freedom and decency and justice.
Robert F Kennedy

Your colleague Miss Lucy Tristram wrote to me on the 9th January to say your Editorial Complaints Unit would write to me in "due course". To date I have not heard from them. Would you please tell me when I can expect an answer? The reason for me writing is that I have recently been forwarded correspondence to you on 9/11 from a different complainant. That correspondence postdates mine by a long way and appears to engage more fully with the author than the BBC have engaged with me over the past 10 months. Mr Colin Tregear, the Director of the Complaints unit, has written extensively in January to the other complainant in reply to a complaint raised in September 2011.

Two MPs wrote to you in the summer of 2011 asking that you address my complaint, in particular one of them was keen to have your answers to the following questions below in bold. They are not meant to be trick questions. They are good pertinent questions which reasonably require good answers if you are impartial at the BBC.

Further I have studied your literature carefully. Despite your correspondence of 2011 obliging me to go through a slow and convoluted complaints process, it now appears from the foreword of your 2007 BBC Trust November complaints bulletin that you at the Trust do not necessarily need a complaint in order to look into something, especially if it is of a serious nature. I also further note that from the BBC's Royal Charter you as Trustees take ultimate responsibility at the BBC for the public interest. Will you now please swiftly address the issues raised in all my correspondence and the following questions in bold.

I am invited to speak at a second London conference in March on this subject. I am in touch with Occupy and the church nationally. I and other friends and experts have sent in lengthy representations and observations to both the Chilcot and Leveson Inquiries. I have the support of a couple of MPs and a large number of activists and experts within the 9/11 Truth movement. I do not set out by making your lives difficult. I just want the BBC to do its job properly and for us all to live in a peaceful world. Truth, or at least impartiality in your case, must be a platform for that decent aspiration.

The questions again are; if you are presenting unbiased 9/11 coverage;

  1. Where is the film footage of the Boeing striking the Pentagon ?
  2. Why haven't your journalists asked the US authorities to see it ? Why is it secret ?
  3. Why haven't you interviewed people like April Gallop who stepped through that hole after the attack and said there was no plane there ?
  4. Why haven't you interviewed firefighters who heard explosions in the Twin Towers ?
  5. Why havent you been able to show substantial wreckage (or photos of) from the Shanksville site ?
  6. Why do you only interview explosives experts that back the official version ?
  7. Why don't you speak to any pilots from pilots for 9/11truth ?
  8. Why don't you speak to victim's family members who still demand an independent investigation ?
  9. Why are 5 of the alleged hijackers alive and well according to your own news reporting ? Who then did hijack the planes ?
  10. Why aren't you seeking written scientific evidence to rebut the compelling claims of the teams of Richard Gage and Niels Harrit ?
  11. Why are your programmes "conspiracy files" on 9/11 so overtly biased as to not withstand scrutiny as fair and objective ie they don't address any of the above issues ?

Thank you.

Yours Sincerely,

Paul Warburton


« Previous item

^ Return to index ^

Next item »